Yesterday I went to an anti-war protest downtown. It was supposed to culminate in a silent walk to a congressman’s office to give him a petition against continuing the war. That sounded good to me, but when I got there, and read over the petition, I couldn’t sign it. I just sat there, holding it, reading it, while the lady who was passing me around waited. Finally I just gave it back to her. It said something like, “We ask the congressman to use his power to stop the war, by voting against all war funding.” Maybe that’s the best way to voice dissent – if congress doesn’t vote for its funding, how can a war continue? Still, it was a lot to ask of him, politically and personally. I can imagine the congressman wrestling with his conscience – denying adequate supplies to the troops on the field might seem a poor way to make a point.
A folk singer offered a few anti-war songs, one of which had a refrain in which the crowd would respond, “It was a lie! It wasn’t true!”
Yeah, it was a lie. It wasn’t true. But now we’re there, in a huge way. There’s an enormous, complicated mess, and we’re involved in it on every level. If we pull out, it could predicate an enormous civil war, complete with ethnic cleansing. The same thing could happen if we stay. I agree with Jessica Mathews, on Charlie Rose’s extremely informative show about the war ( you can watch in online: http://www.charlierose.com/index.shtm.)
who believes that no matter what we choose the outcome will be more or less tragic. Does that mean we try to leave now? Does it mean we make a long-term commitment to the Iraquis, and continue to ignore our commitment to the poor here at home (a la Katrina)? How do we find that “less tragic” outcome, and how do we know we’ve had success, when we already know that success will be limited, at best?
The problem is, no matter what action is taken, we know it will be taken by a hawkish administration that has trouble learning from the past, even a past full of its own mistakes. And we’ve got several more years with those folks in charge.
I don’t want to stand up and yell. I want to sit down and cry.
I’m not angry, I’m scared. I’m more scared about security, peace and freedom in the world than I was right after 9-11. I know I can’t sit on my hands and pretend it isn’t happening, but I don’t want to march around downtown with people whose “not one more day” mantra sounds just as simplistic as “stay the course”.
I do, however, want to find a way to wage peace. I’m less concerned with the exact day we plan to leave, but that we plan to do so. I’m less concerned as to how many posts we have in Iraq, as I am that they inflict as little violence upon the people as possible.
Before the war began, we anti-war folk said it would become a Vietnam-like quagmire, which would destabilize the region, fire up ethnic tensions, and make terrorism more likely to spread. We said it would sap our defenses from areas where they are more desperately needed.
We were right, and it sucks. I don’t feel like gloating for a second.
Now the case for stopping the war is much less clean-cut than it was, full of moral dilemmas. But I think the case is still there. Most importantly, we have to find a way to have hope, but we cannot hope that we’ll leave this region better off than it was. I think that is completely and hopelessly delusional. Maybe someday the Iraquis will build a peaceful democratic nation, but I expect a great deal of chaos to ensue before that happens. And I think it might lessen the chaos if the U.S. was not such a huge presence, trying to make things happen according to our interests, not necessarily theirs.
THAT is the message I want to impart, not just "Bush stinks" (even though I think he does).
I’m not sure how we can fix Iraq. I do know that we have to vote for thoughtful leaders who can dive into this mess and find some solutions.