A (slightly outdated) post on the NYC transit strike
Regardless of whose side you were on in the dispute between the City of New York and the NYC Transit Union, it's pretty amazing to see how a group of blue collar workers can bring the cultural and economic capitol of the world to a screeching halt.
I haven't done an in-depth study on the differences between the union and employers; it's possible that the union's demands were unreasonable. But from what I've read and heard, they wanted to keep their retirement age, and keep their current pension plan in place. That doesn't sound terribly greedy, but times are changing. Many U.S. workers no longer get benefits as good as they have, and many feel that these workers should just move with the times. Many of their fellow blue-collar workers cursed them as they walked to work, and it's understandable, in a way; they had to walk for miles to get to their jobs where they do physical labor, and got pay docked for being late. Evening news reports showed more hardships - people with disabilities who could not work or get to treatment at all, ambulances that could not get to emergency scenes in time. I'll admit that this was a sticky one, morally. Maybe the gain was not worth the havoc wrecked upon the city.
But many people have a knee-jerk reaction when they hear about strikes - they immediately label the workers and union leadership as "selfish". Those who habitually curse striking workers do so because of their sense of morality, but that sense of morality is short-sighted. That NYC is incapacitated when these workers do not show up is evidence that their services are vital to the city, and that their work should be fairly compensated. When one group of workers is fairly compensated, it puts pressure on other employers to raise their standards, to compete for good labor. Allowing workers to organize, and strike when neccessary (while providing checks to union power) improves working conditions for us all.

